El líder de OpenAI advierte sobre la falta de preparación para la IA general y se retira: Un mensaje contundente desde adentro

Ads

Miles Brundage’s departure has caused quite a disturbance within the AI community, particularly following his poignant statement regarding the lack of preparedness for artificial general intelligence (AGI). As the former senior adviser for AGI viability at OpenAI, Brundage has spent six years working on AI safety initiatives within the company. His departure, along with the disbanding of the ‘AGI Readiness’ division, has raised significant concerns about the state of AI research and development globally.

In a statement released on Wednesday, Brundage emphasized that neither OpenAI nor any other organization is adequately prepared for the potential emergence of AGI. This assertion is supported by the dissolution of the ‘AGI Readiness’ team, which adds weight to his warning. As an experienced AI researcher and adviser, Brundage’s departure signals a significant shift within OpenAI and the broader AI research community.

Kylie Robison, a senior AI reporter who collaborates with The Verge’s policy and tech teams, has also shed light on the situation. Having previously worked with Business Insider and Fortune Magazine, Robison brings a wealth of experience and insight to her reporting on AI developments. Her coverage of Brundage’s departure and the implications for AI research has highlighted the complexities and challenges facing the field.

The tensions within OpenAI, including the departures of notable researchers such as Jan Leike and Ilya Sutskever, have been attributed to a shift towards commercialization at the expense of safety and ethical concerns. The company’s push to transition from a nonprofit to a for-profit public benefit corporation has raised questions about its commitment to AI safety and alignment with societal values. Brundage’s departure underscores these concerns, as he cited restrictions on his research and publication freedom as a motivating factor for leaving the organization.

Despite the tensions and departures, OpenAI has extended offers to provide funding, API credits, and early model access to Brundage without any conditions. This gesture demonstrates the company’s recognition of his value and expertise, even as he moves on to pursue independent AI policy discussions and research. Brundage’s decision to leave OpenAI reflects a broader cultural divide within the organization, with researchers grappling with the shift towards more product-oriented goals.

The implications of Brundage’s departure and the dissolution of the ‘AGI Readiness’ division cannot be understated. As the field of AI continues to rapidly evolve, the need for robust safety measures and ethical considerations has never been greater. Brundage’s warning about the lack of preparedness for AGI serves as a wake-up call to the AI community and industry as a whole. The future of AI research and development hinges on our ability to address these challenges and prioritize safety and ethical considerations in the pursuit of AGI.